HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03

DeepRAP: Deep Reasoning, Abstraction & Planning towards trustworthy Cognitive AI Systems

Status
forthcoming
Programme
Horizon Europe (HORIZON)
Action type
HORIZON EIC Grants
Opens
22 Jul 2026
Deadline
28 Oct 2026
Fetched
15 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC
Plain-language summary

Funding for innovative AI projects advancing deep reasoning, abstraction, and planning towards trustworthy cognitive AI systems.

This call supports research to develop AI systems with advanced reasoning, abstraction, and planning capabilities. Projects should focus on trustworthy, explainable, and human-centric AI aligned with EU ethical standards. The goal is to enhance AI's cognitive functions beyond current deep learning methods for real-world complex tasks.

Likely relevant for

  • AI researchers
  • Neuro-symbolic AI developers
  • Cognitive computing experts
  • AI ethics and trustworthiness specialists
  • Research institutions in AI and cognitive sciences
  • SMEs and startups in AI innovation

Project signals

Neuro-symbolic AI approachesDeep reasoning, abstraction, and planningTrustworthy and explainable AIMultimodal data handlingAI aligned with EU AI Act and ethical standards

What it funds

  • Development of AI models and architectures handling multimodal data and uncertainty
  • Provable trustworthiness mechanisms including explainability, fairness, and security
  • Integration of AI capabilities into cognitive systems performing complex real-world tasks at TRL4
  • New methods and metrics for evaluating reasoning and trustworthiness in AI
  • Adherence to FAIR principles for data and models
  • Synergies with EU AI initiatives like TEFs, eBrains, RAISE, AIoD, Quantum Flagship

Expected outcomes

  • Advanced AI models with deep reasoning, abstraction, and planning capabilities
  • Trustworthy AI systems aligned with ethical, legal, and EU AI Act standards
  • Demonstrations of cognitive AI systems solving complex tasks
  • Common benchmarks and evaluation platforms for DeepRAP
  • Joint pilot demonstrations addressing real-world problems
  • Multiagent AI systems with collective reasoning and planning
  • Ethical and societal alignment of AI technologies

Who can apply / participate

  • Single legal entities
  • Consortia of legal entities
  • Consortia must have at least three independent legal entities from different countries
  • At least one entity must be established in an EU Member State
  • Other entities must be from different Member States or Associated Countries
  • Applicants must be established in EU Member States or Associated Countries
  • Eligibility of third-country applicants subject to specific conditions
  • Mid-caps and larger companies not permitted for single beneficiary projects
  • Applications involving European communication networks subject to restrictions
  • Exact list of eligible countries and entities to be confirmed from EIC Work Programme Annex 2

Must check before shortlisting

  • Eligibility of applicant countries and entity types
  • Consortium composition rules
  • Specific focus on cognitive AI capabilities

Money

Up to 8 grants expected, each with minimum €500,000 and maximum €4,000,000 funding in 2026.

  • Total budget for 2026 — 96000000EUR
    Budget shared among all Pathfinder Challenges actions including this call.

Application notes

  • Single-stage submission model.
  • Proposal must meet general and specific eligibility requirements as per EIC Work Programme 2026 Annex 2.
  • Proposal page limit: max 30 pages for sections on Excellence, Impact, and Implementation.
  • Consortium composition rules apply as per call description.
  • Applications involving evolution of European communication networks have restrictions.
  • Prepare proposal following EIC Work Programme 2026 guidelines and call-specific instructions.
  • Submit proposal via Funding & Tenders Portal before deadline.
  • Ensure compliance with page limits and eligibility criteria.
  • Consult Online Manual and FAQs for submission guidance.
  • Check eligibility of applicants and consortium composition carefully.
  • Mid-caps and larger companies not allowed for single beneficiary projects.
  • Restrictions apply for projects involving European communication networks.
  • Evaluation and award criteria detailed in EIC Work Programme Section II.

Derived from official EU Funding portal source · updated 2 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC. Use this as a shortlisting aid; the official call text remains authoritative.

Related calls

These funding calls are closely related and may be worth considering as part of the same funding landscape.

Official source text

Fine print from the EU source record. Expand when you need the original wording.

Topic description

Expected Impact: The resulting portfolio will not only advance the scientific state-of-the-art but also build a robust, interoperable, and application-driven community, positioning Europe at the forefront of trustworthy cognitive AI. It should also lay the foundations for future European leadership in safe, human-centric cognitive AI, supporting sovereignty and competitiveness in key sectors. It will support the ambitions of the AI Act [1] and the European approach to Artificial Intelligence [2] . Expected Outcome: Ambitious proposals put forward under this call will deliver: Models and/or architectures that handle multimodal data and knowledge, uncertainty, and can be trained and deployed with constrained computational resources Provable trustworthiness mechanisms ensuring explainability, transparency, fairness, risk evaluation, security and alignment with ethical and legal standards, including fundamental rights and the EU AI Act, and Demonstrate the developed capabilities integrated in a cognitive AI system (reaching TRL4) performing complex real-world tasks (e.g., scientific discovery, decision support, problem solving) as well as simulations at a scale. In addition, proposals will: Propose new methods and metrics for evaluating and certifying reasoning and trustworthiness in AI as well as the use of the computational resources Follow the FAIR principles ensuring all data, models, and results are Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable to maximise transparency, reproducibility, and impact, and Develop synergies with EU initiatives such as TEFs (AI Testing and Experimentation Facilities) [3] , eBrains [4] , Resource for AI Science in Europe (RAISE) [5] , AI-on-demand Platform (AIoD) [6] and the Quantum Flagship [7] . Portfolio approach The composition of the portfolio of projects to be funded under the DeepRAP Challenge will ensure comprehensive coverage across the following categories with a view to ensuring breadth and enabling synergies between the projects: Category 1 – Cognitive Function Capability: Reasoning, abstraction, and planning should be covered by the selected portfolio. Category 2 – Technological Approach: The selected projects are expected to use a variety of technological approaches, including but not limited to, neuro-symbolic AI, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and novel frameworks inspired by interdisciplinary fields, and Category 3 – Use Case and Application Domain: The selected projects will cover a variety of real-world domains, such as industry, mobility, civil security, scientific discovery, health, cybersecurity, justice and human-robot interaction. The selected projects will also be assigned to lead and/or engage in portfolio activities centred on the following priorities: Interoperability: Establishing common standards and protocols to ensure seamless alignment between projects Benchmark Development: Co-creating a DeepRAP benchmark with shared tasks and an open evaluation platform for transparent assessment Common Pilots: Delivering joint pilot demonstrations addressing complex real-world problems to showcase DeepRAP capabilities Multiagent Integration: where feasible, combining project outcomes into modular, multiagent AI systems demonstrating collective reasoning and planning through structured interactions among multiple agents Application Shaping: Defining impactful use cases and engaging stakeholders to guide the development and adoption of innovative cognitive AI systems, and Ethical and Societal Alignment: Proactively addressing ethical, legal, and societal considerations, including fundamental rights, transparency, privacy, safety, and fairness of cognitive AI systems. Objective: Innovative ideas put forward under this Challenge must explore novel approaches, including combinations of existing techniques (i.e. neuro-symbolic AI), or the creation of entirely new frameworks that go beyond current, traditional, deep learning and reinforcement learning paradigms. These could be inspired by developments in diverse fields such as neuroscience, biology, physics, philosophy and more. The proposals should address one or more of the following cognitive capabilities: Deep Reasoning: Moving beyond statistical pattern matching to support causal inference, logical reasoning, and context-aware or commonsense decision-making in complex, unstructured environments. This requires shifting from purely data-driven correlations to AI systems capable of understanding why patterns emerge, identifying underlying causes, and drawing valid conclusions through both deductive and inductive processes. Neuro-symbolic approaches, which combine the learning power of neural networks with the structured inference of symbolic reasoning are particularly encouraged to advance these capabilities. Integrating contextual and commonsense knowledge enables AI to interpret information more holistically, adapt decisions dynamically, and handle ambiguity and uncertainty. Deep reasoning systems should be able to reconcile multiple sources of information, provide transparent and explainable rationales for their outputs, and align with human values and expectations, ensuring trustworthy and accountable operations in demanding real-world scenarios. Deep Abstraction: Enabling AI systems to generalise insights from limited data by forming, manipulating, and refining high-level concepts, analogies, and representations that can be transferred across diverse application domains. This includes the development of internal world models to support abstraction, foster commonsense understanding, and integrate semantic and contextual awareness. Approaches that combine symbolic reasoning, analogical mapping, and representation learning are particularly encouraged, as they empower AI to interpret meaning, intent, and relationships within complex environments. Progress in deep abstraction is essential for achieving cognitive flexibility, robust transfer learning, and adaptive reasoning in dynamic, data-scarce, or rapidly evolving settings. Deep Planning: Developing robust, adaptive, and scalable planning algorithms/models capable of operating in open-world, agentic, or uncertain real-time environments. This involves leveraging advanced deep learning techniques such as deep reinforcement learning and architectures tailored for planning tasks to enable AI systems to autonomously devise, optimise, and adjust complex strategies in dynamic settings. Neuro-symbolic approaches integrating neural networks with symbolic reasoning are particularly encouraged to address uncertainty, provide formal guarantees, and enable explainable, dependable decision-making. Emphasis is placed on long-term, flexible planning that incorporates cognitive timing and predictive modelling, enabling systems to anticipate and adapt within dynamic contexts. Approaches should explore hierarchical planning across multiple temporal levels, contingency planning for effective fallback strategies, and continual re-planning to dynamically update plans as environments evolve. These advancements will underpin resilient, coordinated, and trustworthy AI planning in complex, unpredictable scenarios. Scope: Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have achieved remarkable progress as evidenced by the ability of Generative AI to recognise patterns and generate contextually relevant outputs based on ever larger models and associated datasets. However, despite the remarkable strides made over the past decade, there remains a significant gap between the capabilities of the human brain and machine intelligence, which must be overcome to achieve robust performance and enable effective interactions with users and stakeholders. Current Generative AI models can release very accurate outputs and even solve some mathematical problems but might struggle with some complex reasoning benchmarks and to understand the real world. These models frequently fail to reliably solve logic tasks and long-term planning, even when provably correct solutions exist, limiting their effectiveness in critical applications where precision is essential. Inspired by the human brain’s ability to process information at multiple levels of abstraction—enabling perception, reasoning, and goal-directed planning—the goal of this Challenge is to move beyond the current state-of-the-art in traditional AI approaches, whether symbolic (e.g., rules, decision trees, symbolic regression, etc.) or connectionist, neural (e.g., deep learning, large language models, reinforcement learning). The goal is to significantly improve the Reasoning, Abstraction, and Planning (RAP) capabilities of AI systems. This will overcome the limitations of current deep learning models, which despite their strengths, have limitations in critical cognitive functions for abstraction, contextualisation, causality, explainability, and intelligible reasoning — competencies that are fundamental to move towards human-like intelligence. [1] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-launches-ai-innovation-package-support-artificial-intelligence-startups-and-smes [2] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_383 150 AI Act | Shaping Europe’s digital future (europa.eu) [3] Sectorial AI Testing and Experimentation Facilities under the Digital Europe Programme | Shaping Europe’s digital future [4] EBRAINS: Europe's Research Infrastructure for Brain Research - EBRAINS [5] [6] Home Page | AI-on-Demand [7] Introduction to the Quantum Flagship | Quantum Flagship

Conditions and documents

General conditions

1. Admissibility conditions: Proposal page limit and layout

In order to apply, your proposal must meet the general eligibility requirements (see Annex 2 of EIC Work Programme 2026) as well as specific eligibility requirements for the Challenge (please see the Topic description above).

Please check for particular elements (e.g., specific application focus or technology) in the respective Challenge chapter.

The EIC Pathfinder Challenges support collaborative or individual research and innovation from consortia or from single legal entities established in a Member State or an Associated Country (unless stated otherwise in the specific Challenge chapter). In case of a consortium your proposal must be submitted by the coordinator on behalf of the consortium. Consortia of two entities must be comprised of independent legal entities from two different Member States or Associated Countries. Consortia of three or more entities must include as beneficiaries at least three legal entities, independent from each other and each established in a different country as follows:

  • at least one legal entity established in a Member State; and
  • at least two other independent legal entities, each established in different Member States or Associated Countries.

The legal entities may for example be universities, research organisations, SMEs, start-ups, natural persons. In the case of single beneficiary projects, mid-caps and larger companies will not be permitted.

Applications with elements that concern the evolution of European communication networks (5G, post-5G and other technologies linked to the evolution of European communication networks) will be subject to restriction for the protection of European communication networks (see Annex II – Section B1).

The standard admissibility and eligibility conditions and the eligibility of applicants from third countries are detailed in Annex 2.

Proposal page limit and layout:

Described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.

Sections 1 to 3 of the part B of your proposal, corresponding respectively to the evaluation criteria Excellence, Impact, and Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation, must consist of a maximum of 30 format A4 pages. Excess pages will be automatically made invisible, and will not be taken into consideration by the evaluators. Please also consult Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2026.

2. Eligible countries

Described in Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2026.

3. Other Eligibility Conditions

Described in Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2026.

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion

Described in Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2026.

5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds

Described in Section II of the EIC Work Programme 2026.

5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes

Described in Section II of the EIC Work Programme 2026 and the Online Manual.

5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement

Described in Section II of the EIC Work Programme 2026.

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants

Please refer to the Lump Sum Model Grant Agreement (Lump Sum MGA) used for Lump Sum EIC actions under Horizon Europe.

Specific conditions

Described in the EIC Work Programme 2026.

Support information

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant. Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe. Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management. Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular. National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’). Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding. IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc. European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues. CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal. The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers. Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

Raw budget overview
{
  "budgetYearsColumns": [
    "2026"
  ],
  "budgetTopicActionMap": {
    "114542": [
      {
        "action": "HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 - HORIZON-EIC HORIZON EIC Grants",
        "expectedGrants": 8,
        "minContribution": 500000,
        "maxContribution": 4000000,
        "budgetYearMap": {
          "2026": "96000000"
        },
        "plannedOpeningDate": "2026-07-22",
        "deadlineModel": "single-stage",
        "deadlineDates": [
          "2026-10-28"
        ]
      },
      {
        "action": "HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-01 - HORIZON-EIC HORIZON EIC Grants",
        "expectedGrants": 8,
        "minContribution": 500000,
        "maxContribution": 4000000,
        "budgetYearMap": {
          "2026": "96000000"
        },
        "plannedOpeningDate": "2026-07-22",
        "deadlineModel": "single-stage",
        "deadlineDates": [
          "2026-10-28"
        ]
      },
      {
        "action": "HORIZON-EIC-2026-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 - HORIZON-EIC HORIZON EIC Grants",
        "expectedGrants": 8,
        "minContribution": 500000,
        "maxContribution": 4000000,
        "budgetYearMap": {
          "2026": "96000000"
        },
        "plannedOpeningDate": "2026-07-22",
        "deadlineModel": "single-stage",
        "deadlineDates": [
          "2026-10-28"
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}